By Leni Spooner, creator of Between the Lines.
Jack and Diane thought they’d beaten the odds. Their home sits on a quiet suburban street, miles from the nearest river, far from forest edges, nowhere near the coasts where hurricanes hit. They never worried much about fire or flood. Yet when the renewal notice for their home insurance arrived this spring, they nearly dropped it: their premium had doubled.
They hadn’t filed a claim. Their home hadn’t been damaged. Nothing had changed for them — except everything had changed for the insurance industry.
What Jack and Diane are experiencing isn’t just bad luck or a greedy insurer gouging them personally. It’s the new geography of risk — where families far from obvious danger zones end up paying more and more, not only in higher insurance premiums but also through rising taxes to cover disaster aid and even the cleanup of abandoned corporate messes.
In short: ordinary families have become the world’s default insurers. And they’re paying over and over.
Premiums Rising Everywhere
The common assumption is that insurance premiums climb only in disaster-prone areas — wildfire belts, floodplains, hurricane corridors. But the reality is different.
In the United States, average home insurance costs rose by more than 11% in 2023 alone, even in states with relatively few natural disasters. In Canada, premiums have climbed between 20–30% over the last five years, not just in Alberta’s fire zones but also in safer places like Ontario and Quebec. Across Europe, reinsurers like Munich Re and Swiss Re have sharply increased prices, and those hikes ripple down to households in regions with little direct risk.
This isn’t simply cross-subsidization. Over the last five years, the global insurance industry has begun rewriting its rulebook. Lloyd’s of London, the world’s oldest insurance marketplace, and major players like Hiscox have openly warned that climate change is forcing a recalibration: higher premiums are not optional, they are the new baseline for the industry to remain solvent.
Reinsurance — the invisible layer that sits behind every local insurer — has doubled catastrophe-related payouts compared to the prior five-year average. To survive, reinsurers are hiking their own rates, which flow directly into every homeowner’s bill, even in supposedly “safe” zones.
For families like Jack and Diane, geography no longer provides protection. Risk is being repriced at the global level. Premiums are rising everywhere, and households are caught in the middle.
When Insurers Walk Away, Governments Step In
Rising premiums are only part of the story. In the hardest-hit regions, private insurers are simply walking away. State Farm and Allstate have already stopped writing new policies in California’s wildfire zones. In Florida, multiple insurers have gone bankrupt or withdrawn after repeated hurricanes. In parts of Canada, flood insurance is either prohibitively expensive or unavailable altogether.
The global industry acknowledges this retreat. Hiscox’s CEO has described premium hikes as a “signal to policymakers” — a warning that rebuilding in high-risk zones is unsustainable without massive public subsidy. In the UK, Flood Re’s “Build Back Better” program now bakes in taxpayer-backed resilience upgrades, a tacit admission that private markets can’t handle climate risk alone.
When insurers step back, governments are forced to step forward. FEMA in the U.S. now spends billions each year on disaster relief, often dwarfing private insurance payouts. Canada’s Disaster Financial Assistance Arrangements program has paid out more than $7.5 billion since 2011, with the pace accelerating as wildfires and floods grow more severe. The European Union has a solidarity fund for cross-border disasters that national insurers won’t touch.
One way or another, taxpayers end up footing the bill. You might never see smoke in your sky or water in your basement, but part of your tax bill is already earmarked for rebuilding someone else’s town. That is solidarity in practice — but it’s also a transfer of risk away from corporations and onto ordinary citizens.
Taxpayer Dollars Before Disaster Strikes
And then there are the bills that come due before a single fire burns or flood hits.
Across Canada and the U.S., hundreds of thousands of orphaned oil and gas wells sit uncapped, quietly leaking methane and contaminating groundwater. Alberta alone has more than 170,000. When the companies that drilled them went bankrupt or simply dissolved, taxpayers were left to foot the cleanup bill. The tab runs into the billions.
It’s a similar story with abandoned strip mines, tailings ponds, and contaminated industrial sites. Reclaiming the land requires planting, soil rebuilding, and water treatment — work that stretches for decades and costs far more than the profits companies once extracted. The U.S. has its Superfund program. Britain still pays to monitor and reclaim coal mines shuttered generations ago. Eastern Europe struggles with chemical dumps left behind after the fall of state industries.
These are the “silent disasters” that don’t make the evening news. No one watches a town burn on live television. But they drain public coffers all the same, pre-emptively, before the next climate catastrophe even arrives.
📦 Callout: New Models of Insurance
The industry isn’t standing still. Some new approaches are emerging, though they often shift risk in different ways.
- Parametric Insurance: Instead of assessing damages after the fact, payouts are triggered automatically by data — for example, water levels in a flood gauge or wind speed in a hurricane. It’s faster and more transparent, but still requires households to buy in.
- Flood Re (UK): A national program that subsidizes high-risk homes by pooling premiums and offering “Build Back Better” funds for resilience upgrades up to £10,000. It works, but only because taxpayers underwrite the system.
These experiments show innovation, but they also highlight a central truth: the cost of climate disruption is too great for private markets alone. Sooner or later, it lands on the public balance sheet.
The Polluters’ Free Pass
What makes this cycle especially bitter is the contrast between who pays and who profits.
The Carbon Majors database shows that just 100 companies have been responsible for 71% of global industrial emissions since 1988. Yet these same companies continue to post record profits. In 2022 and 2023, oil majors reaped windfalls from high prices even as governments spent record sums on climate disaster response.
And while households and taxpayers are footing the bill for recovery and cleanup, many of these firms still receive subsidies, tax incentives, and political protection. Their profits are privatized. Their risks are socialized.
Triple Jeopardy for Ordinary Families
For most households, home is the largest asset they will ever own. But in today’s geography of risk, it is beginning to look more like a liability. Families are paying three times over:
- Higher premiums, even in “safe” zones.
- Higher taxes to fund disaster relief.
- Higher taxes again to clean up corporate messes like orphaned wells and abandoned mines.
Meanwhile, the polluters most responsible for worsening climate disruption — and the insurers who protect their balance sheets — carry on with minimal accountability. The burden lands on ordinary citizens, not on the corporations profiting from extraction or financial engineering.
Who Should Pay?
If geography no longer guarantees safety, fairness must not become another casualty.
Some solutions are on the table. Governments can require companies to post cleanup bonds before drilling or mining, ensuring taxpayers aren’t left with the mess. Polluter-pays levies could funnel into disaster relief and reclamation funds. Climate-linked insurance pools could be designed to reduce the unfair burden on households in supposedly “safe” zones.
But until those measures are adopted at scale, the geography of risk will remain a geography of injustice — where families like Jack and Diane pay over and over, for disasters they never caused and messes they never made.
📚 References & Further Reading
Insurance & Premium Trends
- Insurance Information Institute (Triple-I) — Facts + Statistics: Homeowners and Renters Insurance (U.S. premium increases, 2023). Available at iii.org → Research & Data.
- Insurance Bureau of Canada (IBC) — Trends in Home Insurance Premiums, 2017–2022. Available at ibc.ca → Reports & Publications.
- Swiss Re Institute — Economic Insights: Climate Change and Natural Catastrophes (global reinsurance pricing, catastrophe payouts). Available at swissre.com → Institute.
- Lloyd’s of London — Future at Lloyd’s: Climate Risk and Insurance Market Adaptation. Available at lloyds.com → Insights → Futureset.
- Financial Times — Insurance leaders warn climate change forces permanent rise in premiums (news coverage, 2023).
- Hiscox plc — CEO annual report remarks, 2023: climate premiums as “signals to policymakers.”
Disaster Relief & Public Costs
- Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) — Disaster Relief Fund Monthly Reports. Available at fema.gov → Reports & Data.
- Government of Canada — Disaster Financial Assistance Arrangements (DFAA) Payments, 2011–2023. Available at canada.ca → Public Safety Canada.
- European Commission — EU Solidarity Fund Annual Report. Available at ec.europa.eu → Regional Policy → Solidarity Fund.
Corporate Liability & Cleanup
- Alberta Energy Regulator (AER) — Inactive and Orphaned Wells Liability Management Program. Available at aer.ca → Liability Management.
- U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) — Superfund: History and Impact. Available at epa.gov/superfund.
Polluters & Profits
- Carbon Majors Database (CDP) — The Carbon Majors Report (2017): 100 companies responsible for 71% of emissions since 1988.
- International Energy Agency (IEA) — World Energy Investment 2023 (oil & gas profits vs climate costs). Available at iea.org → Reports.
About the Author
Leni Spooner is a Canadian writer, researcher, and civic storyteller. She is the founder of Between the Lines | Kitchen Table Politics, a longform publication exploring how policy, economics, food systems, and everyday life intersect. Her work blends historical context with present-day analysis, helping readers see the deeper patterns that shape Canada’s choices — and the lives built around them.
If you enjoy thoughtful, independent writing, you can:
👉 Subscribe to Between the Lines to receive updates and new essays
👉 Buy Leni a coffee to support this work
💡 If you found this post valuable, thoughtful, or worth a second read—consider supporting my work with a coffee. Independent analysis takes time, and every bit helps fuel the next deep dive.
👉 Buy Me a Coffee (Thank you—truly.)
💬 Join the Conversation
If this piece resonated with you—or raised new questions—I’d be grateful if you shared it, left a comment, or passed it along to someone who’d value the read. Between the Lines grows one thoughtful reader at a time, and your voice is part of that.